WIT Press


Earthquake Protection For High-speed Rail Traffic: Risky Business?

Price

Free (open access)

Volume

108

Pages

10

Page Range

507 - 516

Published

2009

Size

844 kb

Paper DOI

10.2495/SAFE090471

Copyright

WIT Press

Author(s)

S. Vecchiato, E. Rascol & W.-J. Zwanenburg

Abstract

For earthquake protection of structures (such as bridges, viaducts and embankments), a precise and safe dimensioning has to be calculated according to the soil profile, the location of potentially active faults, and the local liquefaction risk, as they all influence the damaging potential of seismic waves. In many European countries, these measures are considered to be sufficient for structures to withstand earthquakes and to guarantee a proper level of safety (i.e. avoiding a collapse of the structures). High-speed rail lines, however, have very strict limits regarding the position of the track to continue a safe support and guiding of trains running at speeds of 300 km/h or more. Even if structures have not collapsed, or landslides have not occurred, the track position after an earthquake can be beyond the limits for safe running at 300 km/h. This study shows that different countries deal with these strict limits in different ways. Keywords: earthquakes, high-speed trains, embankment, structure dimensioning, monitoring, risk analysis.

Keywords

earthquakes, high-speed trains, embankment, structure dimensioning, monitoring, risk analysis